Can you have a negative value for transmitted radiation?
A - Yes
B - No
Radiation beneath plant canopies
Diffuse (d) radiation penetrates the canopy more effectively than direct (s) radiation
Ratio \(\frac{SW_d\downarrow}{SW_s\downarrow}\) increases with depth into canopy.
Scattering of direct radiation helps increase proportion of diffuse PAR in the canopy.
\(\frac{NIR\downarrow}{PAR\downarrow}\) increases with depth into canopy.
The high PAR absorptivity of leaves in the upper canopy results in depleted PAR in the lower canopy.
Changes with seasons
Changes with seasons
Radiation above & below boreal aspen canopy
Changes with seasons (iClicker)
Which bar on the graph (A or B) would represent the proportion of radiation reaching the floor of a deciduous forest in late winter?
Figure 2: Proportion of radiation reaching the forest floor
Radiation and understory
Dense hemlock stand little or no understory
Open alder forest with lush understory
‘Sunflecks’
Sunflecks move with position of sun
Rapid change from sunlit to shadowed
Temporally Variability
Canopy Position & Photosynthesis
Figure 3: Rates of CO2 uptake (photosynthesis) at different light levels for different species in a forest
Take home points
Radiative transfer through plant canopies can be approximated using Beer’s Law using the cumulative Leaf Area Index (L) instead of the distance, plus path length and a clumping factor.
Radiation within plant canopies is not uniformly distributed in space, time (‘sunflecks’) and with regard to spectral characteristics.
We can use radiative transfer theory to infer the LAI of a stand if we measure short-wave radiation transmission.